Simple. Intuitive. Precise. Fast.
Absolutely.
CephNinja is a simple orthodontic app that turns your iPhone and iPad into a powerful cephalometric analysis and patient management tool. Whether you’re a busy clinician, a visiting practitioner, an academician or an enthusiastic dental student, CephNinja is sure to make your life easier.
Super intuitive features
ImportQuickly import radiographs and photographs from your device gallery or take an instant picture from the camera.
|
AnalyzeSelect from a list of various popular cephalometric and photographic analysis. Super zoom in for precise landmark identification. View accurate results with a few taps.
|
CustomizeOur fantastic new feature lets you quickly tap and select the variables that you care for most and create your own custom made cephalometric analysis.
|
CalibrateImage calibration is a breeze! Our CephNinja virtual ruler lets you instantly calibrate your radiographs with high accuracy.
|
Keep recordsEasily add 3D models, photographs, notes and other records to new or existing folders. Use the smart orthodontic keyboard to add clinical notes effortlessly!
|
Save and exportCreate beautifully laid out PDFs of your saved records and share via email. Export analysis results as CSV files for viewing in other apps like Microsoft Excel® and Numbers® app on IOS devices
|
Recent scientific literature
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists (2020)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Supplement, October 2020, Pages S67-S73
Title: Smartphone applications used in orthodontics: A scoping review of scholarly literature
Authors: Nikhilesh R. Vaid, Ismaeel Hansa and Yashodhan Bichu
About the study: The review aimed to determine the scope and extent of the published literature on mobile apps in orthodontics as well as identify the types of studies published, and summarize the outcomes studied. One of the key goals of the study was to give direction for future research in a rapidly evolving subject area.
Conclusion: The authors, as one of their conclusions found that our app had the highest number or studies performed on it and was overall found to be accurate and reliable.
Angle Orthodontist (2019)
Angle Orthod (2019) 89 (6): 889–896.
Title: Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software
Authors: Christos Livas; Konstantina Delli; Frederik K. L. Spijkervet; Arjan Vissink; Pieter U. Dijkstra
About the study: Assessed the diagnostic accuracy of two smartphone cephalometric analysis apps (CephNinja and OneCeph) compared with Viewbox software
Conclusion: The study concluded that OneCeph has a high validity compared with Viewbox, while CephNinja is the best alternative to Viewbox regarding reliability. It also concluded that smartphone apps may have a great potential in supplementing traditional cephalometric analysis.
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics (2020)
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33(3): 142-9
Title: Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings
Authors: Pamir Meriç , Julia Naoumova
About the study: The study compared 4 different systems relating to cephalometric analysis: fully automated, computerized, app-aided and manual tracing. In the study, the accuracy of manual cephalometric analysis was compared to cephalometric analysis using AI (CephX), a computerized method (Dolphin Imaging) and an app-aided method (CephNinja).
Results and conclusion: The article concluded that the AI method (with manual corrections) is promising for clinical practice and also confirmed that both CephNinja and Dolphin are comparable to the manual methodology.
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation (2020)
Int J Orthod Rehabil 2020;11:65-8.
Title: Comparison of reproducibility of cephalometric measurements derived from handheld (smartphone) device application versus manual cephalometric tracing
Authors: Sarvraj Singh Kohli, Virinder Singh Kohli
About the study: The objective of the study was to assess the reproducibility of cephalometric measurements derived from an application (CephNinja) designed for handheld (smartphone) devices and manual cephalometry
Conclusion: Handheld (smartphone)‑assisted cephalometric analysis (with CephNinja) shows good agreement with manual tracing and can be employed for clinical decision‑making.
Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community dentistry (2020)
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 May-Jun; 10(3): 286–291.
Title: Comparative Evaluation of CephNinja for Android and NemoCeph for Computer for Cephalometric Analysis: A Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of CephNinja for Cephalometric Analysis
Authors: Mukesh Kumar, Sommya Kumari, Ambuj Chandna, Konark, Anju Singh, Harsh Kumar and Punita
About the study: The aim of this study was to compare values of cephalometric analysis performed by CephNinja and NemoCeph for Downs’s analysis
Conclusion: CephNinja presented a satisfactory result with NemoCeph, and can be used interchangeably with confidence.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Supplement, October 2020, Pages S67-S73
Title: Smartphone applications used in orthodontics: A scoping review of scholarly literature
Authors: Nikhilesh R. Vaid, Ismaeel Hansa and Yashodhan Bichu
About the study: The review aimed to determine the scope and extent of the published literature on mobile apps in orthodontics as well as identify the types of studies published, and summarize the outcomes studied. One of the key goals of the study was to give direction for future research in a rapidly evolving subject area.
Conclusion: The authors, as one of their conclusions found that our app had the highest number or studies performed on it and was overall found to be accurate and reliable.
Angle Orthodontist (2019)
Angle Orthod (2019) 89 (6): 889–896.
Title: Concurrent validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis using smartphone apps and computer software
Authors: Christos Livas; Konstantina Delli; Frederik K. L. Spijkervet; Arjan Vissink; Pieter U. Dijkstra
About the study: Assessed the diagnostic accuracy of two smartphone cephalometric analysis apps (CephNinja and OneCeph) compared with Viewbox software
Conclusion: The study concluded that OneCeph has a high validity compared with Viewbox, while CephNinja is the best alternative to Viewbox regarding reliability. It also concluded that smartphone apps may have a great potential in supplementing traditional cephalometric analysis.
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics (2020)
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33(3): 142-9
Title: Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings
Authors: Pamir Meriç , Julia Naoumova
About the study: The study compared 4 different systems relating to cephalometric analysis: fully automated, computerized, app-aided and manual tracing. In the study, the accuracy of manual cephalometric analysis was compared to cephalometric analysis using AI (CephX), a computerized method (Dolphin Imaging) and an app-aided method (CephNinja).
Results and conclusion: The article concluded that the AI method (with manual corrections) is promising for clinical practice and also confirmed that both CephNinja and Dolphin are comparable to the manual methodology.
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation (2020)
Int J Orthod Rehabil 2020;11:65-8.
Title: Comparison of reproducibility of cephalometric measurements derived from handheld (smartphone) device application versus manual cephalometric tracing
Authors: Sarvraj Singh Kohli, Virinder Singh Kohli
About the study: The objective of the study was to assess the reproducibility of cephalometric measurements derived from an application (CephNinja) designed for handheld (smartphone) devices and manual cephalometry
Conclusion: Handheld (smartphone)‑assisted cephalometric analysis (with CephNinja) shows good agreement with manual tracing and can be employed for clinical decision‑making.
Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community dentistry (2020)
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 May-Jun; 10(3): 286–291.
Title: Comparative Evaluation of CephNinja for Android and NemoCeph for Computer for Cephalometric Analysis: A Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Performance of CephNinja for Cephalometric Analysis
Authors: Mukesh Kumar, Sommya Kumari, Ambuj Chandna, Konark, Anju Singh, Harsh Kumar and Punita
About the study: The aim of this study was to compare values of cephalometric analysis performed by CephNinja and NemoCeph for Downs’s analysis
Conclusion: CephNinja presented a satisfactory result with NemoCeph, and can be used interchangeably with confidence.
